Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Navigation

Categories

Search

Archives

<September 2010>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2930311234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293012
3456789

More Links








Searched for : bisi
Martin Bisi: A conversation Part 3
Posted by peter

Bisi_smallFace300.jpgAmong the many artists producer Martin Bisi has worked with over the years is one Ginger Baker, who, of course, is known far and wide as the wonderfully talented drummer for Cream.

In this, the third and final installment of our conversation with Bisi, who recently released a strikingly original solo album titled Sirens of the Apocalypse, he talks about working with Baker on the legendary skins punisher's solo album, Middle Passage, and touches on his experience with Brian Eno, before taking us inside the studio that's been the site of so much groundbreaking experimental recording over the years.

Talk about your work with Ginger Baker on his solo album, Middle Passage.
Martin Bisi: Yeah, well that was an interesting concoction. I think that was at a time when ... that was my first reforming with [longtime collaborator Bill] Laswell, because we kind of had our falling out, and then we sort of reformed again a bit. And then, when we reformed, he was like balls-out world music, you know. It’s funny because early, early material with Bill... my early stuff was almost like New Wave pop-rock. And then he slowly, slowly started going more blatant into like world music.

Anyway, so that was part of that reforming the first time we got back together. He was being very prolific. At that time, he had a label deal with Island, and I remember, specifically, we were just kicking stuff out. It was almost just more about recording ideas, and it was all very Laswell oriented, and there was a lot of experimentation and weird sampling and stuff, and we would just get guests. And I think the problem with that was, it was hard to know what anything was. Like we would just record things, and we would go, “Well, what is this?”

I remember it was starting to be a little improvised as to what things were, like he would go, “Well, maybe this could be material?” And then there was some other songs where one of his collaborators, Nicky Scopalitis — who plays a lot of like, you know, near-Eastern stringed instruments, like Utes, and Bazukis and stuff — and if Nicky played a lot on that song, basically, Bill would be, “You know what, this could be a Nicky. This could be part of the Nicky record.” And then he’d go, “Well then, maybe Nicky should throw in another couple of songs.” So, then we have a Nicky record.
 
So, really, it wasn’t even clear what things were. Strangely enough, the Ginger Baker record was a little like that. It was like, “Oh, we’ll have Ginger Baker come in and play.” And he played, and then, suddenly, it was like, “You know what? Hey, this could be a Ginger Baker record.” So, I know that sounds a little odd, but that’s kind of how it went, and then we told... well, you know, we, I wasn’t at that conversation, but I guess Bill told Ginger, “Hey, you know what? We’d love to make a Ginger Baker record,” after it was half recorded, and he played the drums on everything.

So, that was actually really funny because they arrived, and it’s funny because I knew, and Bill was like, “Don’t say anything.” But, that’s what I’m thinking about. And I’m like, OK, and they arrived after having that lunch, and then Ginger was just like totally making fun of us, like (imitating Ginger), “OK, can I hear my record, then? Would that be OK? And if I have an idea for my record, would that be OK, too? And what’s the artwork going to be for my record?” He was totally like making fun of us. It was pretty hilarious.

So, I’m not trying to denigrate it at all, but you know, it is... I think it’s legitimate as a Ginger Baker record, but that’s kind of what happened.

A lot of work has been done over the years at BC Studio, the recording space you’ve owned since the early ’80s. How has the space evolved since the early days, and what kind of environment did you want to create with it?
MB: Yeah, it has physically changed quite a bit actually. Initially, it didn’t have the bottom floor. Initially, it was just two floors, and I guess the top floor doesn’t really count, because that’s kind of where I live, and that’s sort of the lounge area and stuff. But, initially, it was just the two floors.

So, I actually recorded everything in the control room. In other words, the board and the speakers were right there, and then there was like a large space in front of the board, and that’s where people recorded. Also, one thing that’s kind of significant is, with me, I didn’t really start envisioning a big career as an engineer or producer. It was literally something that I felt I could do and contribute, and I enjoyed it, but there was no big, long-term plan. I sort of started dabbling with it when I was 17, but that was more so, because there was like no place I felt I fit in musically. And I played drums at the time, and it didn’t seem like... I mean, for some reason, everything I played sounded very like funky, and it just didn’t seem like there was anywhere for me to fit in. Also, it seemed like drumming wasn’t really... I mean, even though I related to it as an instrument, it didn’t seem like it was involved enough in a way. I mean, drums, it’s just play the beat. It seemed like recording and being involved with producing, it was actually more creative in a bigger sense than actually drumming. I don’t want to put down drumming, but that’s how I was feeling.

Like it seemed like, unless I was going to be an unbelievable drummer, there was something more exciting that I could be doing. Also, what’s funny is, I just had a very strange, incredibly confident attitude. I can’t believe how confident I was. I actually believed that I was so the man that I could walk into any recording situation, without even knowing anything, and just do something just because I was me. I mean, it’s unbelievable when I think about it, because I don’t definitely don’t have those kinds of balls now, I think. I don’t ... I assume if I don’t know about how to do something, it’s not going to fly. Then I figured I don’t even need to know. I just go in, and I just start touching things and things are just going to happen. I totally believed that, and sometimes, it worked, and sometimes it didn’t.

In fact, when I worked with Eno, I think I had that kind of attitude, and it was fine for about a day, and then he soon realized I didn’t know anything. But, what’s so funny is, I completely presented myself like, “Yeah, I can do this.” So, I don’t know how you want to categorize that. I guess it’s just youthful folly, youthful overconfidence, maybe just ignorance. I really believed there was nothing more to know about it.

So, my point is, is that the studio was pretty bare knuckles. And, because I just thought I was doing this just at the moment, yeah we’re going to record next week, yeah, maybe we can get some stuff and record a few records, you know? I really wasn’t thinking... I wasn’t making plans for 10 years or anything like that. And, I wasn’t making any plans in terms of like great recordings. I wasn’t even thinking... that’s maybe why my attitude of recording was that way. I wasn’t really thinking along the lines of sessional recording. I wasn’t even suggesting that I was getting anyone a professional recording. In fact, I was almost against professional-sounding recording. I would hear them and go, "Yeah, you can just totally tell that’s some professional stuff." You know, and I would just be like ... in fact, the thing I really despised at the time was like fusion. There was a lot of very clean, very separated sounding recordings of like fusion of rock and jazz ... like Jeff Beck kind of stuff. And that’s the stuff I was like, “you can hear every single thing. How boring is that?” So, I had this attitude, I would just go in there, and it would just be right. So, anyway, with the studio being totally ... not a sort of, you know, well-honed situation ... you know, that’s just kind of how it was.

The board and the monitors were right in front in the same room, and eventually I acquired the space underneath. And that’s when I started getting a little more serious. I mean, the space underneath me was just available, and I thought, “Maybe I should get this.” And then it occurred to me, maybe I could be a little more serious and actually think about acoustics and stuff, and then that’s when I started really going into a different place. That took a little while.

What’s next for Martin Bisi?
MB: Honestly, I’m just trying to focus on me, as an artist. I must admit I’ve gotten a little disillusioned about ... a little disillusioned, I don’t want to make it out to be a very negative thing, but I’ve got a bit disillusioned about recording and engineering and producing. And basically, most of my creative output belongs to someone else. It has someone else’s name on it, and in a big way, it’s very hierarchical in a sense, you know? It’s like... and I know it’s hierarchical, but what’s been stunning to me is, how extremely hierarchical it is, not just that the artist’s name is at the front. It’s just that that’s all anyone really cares about. It’s a very tiny niche of people who really care who recorded a record, even though the whole process of recording, of anything really, is very collaberative, but really, it’s like this hierarchy.

It’s not just hierarchy. It’s like, winner takes all in a sense, you know. So, I guess I’ve just been feeling like engineering and producing is not exactly the best deal in a way. It’s almost like the more successful stuff becomes — I mean honestly, not to be too negative, because I’ve gotten a lot of good from all this — I’ve felt almost a little ripped off at times, you know, and it’s consistent. It’s not like one or two times. It’s like it’s just the way it works, so not to be too negative, but I’m trying to be me, me, me.

To hear a podcast of our interview with Martin, visit the multimedia area of www.goldminemag.com. And for more on Martin Bisi, visit www.martinbisi.com.




Wednesday, January 07, 2009 9:10:35 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [0]
Martin Bisi: A conversation Part 2
Posted by peter

bisi_drink_close.jpgThroughout much of Martin Bisi's career, John Zorn and Bill Laswell have served as his co-conspirators in furthering musical experimentation and pushing the envelope to its tearing point in the wild, lawless world of the avant-garde.

There were also dalliances with Brian Eno and his ambient-music projects along the way, and then came perhaps his most important contribution — helping Herbie Hancock unleash the robotic funk-jazz fusion of "Rockit" on the world.

In 2008, Bisi, known primarily as a producer, released the completely unconventional Sirens Of The Apocalypse LP, a highly literate album of original music that dealt heavily with gender issues and did so with Bisi's usual flair for experimental recording and creating unique melodies.

In Part 2 of our interview with Bisi, he talks about his relationships with Zorn, Laswell and Eno, and the genesis of Hancock's "Rockit." Look for Part 3 tomorrow, and do check out www.martinbisi.com to learn more about one of the most original, innovative musical svengali's of this age.

Around 1979-80, you fell in John Zorn and Bill Laswell, two pioneers exploring the frontier of musical experimentation. And later, you met Brian Eno and participated in recording sessions that produced material for Eno’s ambient series. What did you find you had in common with these musicians?
Martin Bisi: Um, well, it’s really kind of hard to answer, because it’s hard to really know. In fact, I’m still discovering that. I sort of fell out with... I fell out with Zorn and Laswell, and I’ve just recently, like in the last year, sort of reconnected, and it’s funny because we’re all of us still sort of discovering what it was, what social chemistry drew us together, made us create together, what we had in common. I mean, we’re still discovering it.

I think the whole chemistry of it is very complicated, and it’s definitely hard for me, because I was 17 and 18 then. For me to give you any real analysis of what was going on, I think it’s impossible because I just wasn’t sophisticated enough or wise enough to understand all the things that were going on. I think a lot of it was instinct, you know, something instinctual just — and social — kind of brought us together, because when you think about it, we’re very different, you know. Laswell doesn’t ... he told me the other day, he was like, “You know what, I don’t like jazz,” for instance, and Zorn is totally, like, “jazz.” Bill is totally into this like dub thing. I don’t think Zorn likes dub, you know, terribly much.

And look at me. I’m like trying to make, you know, catchy melodies and create like little, you know, catchy choruses. Zorn is definitely not into that. You know, I remember sometimes using the word “hook” around him, and he’d go, “Oh God, hooks. What are you, trying to be like R.E.M.?” You know what I mean? And I’m like, “Yeah, maybe a little.” So, in terms of what drew us together, in a way, we’re all coming from completely different kind of places and perspectives.

I think a lot of it, very simply, is we communicated. That’s what I meant by the social chemistry. We probably communicated well, and there’s something to be said for that. Also, the energy. We communicated well, and we’re all willing, and we’re all very eager to work and to be industrious and produce things. So, it’s just the fodder for creativity in that... it’s almost like action, you know. It’s like, if we communicate and use some of the same language, and there’s respect, like we respect what each other does and [are] sort of fascinated by it... like Zorn was always a little fascinated by some of the rock stuff I was doing, like Live Skull or Foetus. And it’s nothing like what he does, but he always had a little, kind of a side respect for that. And you know, I really did love his avant-garde stuff. Although it’s funny, for me, being a musician, you’ll notice I never once tried to be in one of his games. I never once tried to be in one of his avant-garde game performances like at all. I mean, I’m happy to be in the audience for that stuff, but it’s just not what I feel like doing.
So, I think, yes, it’s just communication — very personal all that kind of stuff. That’s also what I said before about working with stuff that’s grass roots, you know. That there’s something, rather than people just call me because they’ve read the bio or something. People that I’ve met that’s, just over a little bit of time, start thinking, “Oh, maybe there’s something here,” or they realize we communicate well together or have fun together, and that’s sometimes when the good stuff happens.
  
Your partnership with Laswell’s Material project eventually led to the world of hip-hop and your work with Herbie Hancock on “Rockit,” a track that won Hancock a Grammy. Take us through the recording process for that, and the inspiration for it, and what are your reflections on it all these years later?
MB: Well, that’s a song that’s really given me a tremendous amount of satisfaction, you know, to have been involved in. I think, because it did so much for hip-hop, I think it really just did a lot for the country, even, because it was sort of the first song to really identify urban, I think, as a mass market; as a sort of, you know, national market, as opposed to strictly just something that just happened in their city.

So, that gave me a lot of satisfaction. Occasionally, maybe this is going a bit far on that, but sometimes I even think that song saved lives, because that time was also very violent, very, very rough, you know, in the cities. I mean, there was a lot of crime — lots and lots of crime, self-destructive and very dangerous, very gang-oriented, and you know, somehow, hip-hop, despite the gangsta rap sensibilities and all that other stuff, it led to a lot of health in a way.
There was a lot of young people with more self-respect and a lot less of an interest in crime. Like, I didn’t have to walk down the streets of Brooklyn scared of every group of teenagers I’d see on every corner, like I used to, you know. But, anyway, the song itself, interestingly enough, was initially supposed to be a demo.

We didn’t really know that we’d be working on the Herbie Hancock record. Herbie told Bill that... well, he said that he wanted to do something like “Buffalo Gals,” which was a song that Malcolm McLaren had done, which was a bit of a club hit, you know, and it was sort of hip-hop oriented. It’s funny because Malcolm McLaren... he was the first one who sort of did something in hip-hop, you know, that was sort of not just in the Bronx, you know. He did something in England that started getting played in New York in the clubs, and Herbie said to Bill, “I want to do something like that.”

And we’d already been going to like the hip-hop nights at this club called The Roxy, which was amazing, and like, you know, everyone was down there, whether it was Sonic Youth or Madonna. That’s where you always headed on a Friday night, and all the break dancers would come out and everything. So, Bill said, “Oh, we know a lot of these people. Why don’t we throw something together.” And so, in the studio, at my place, we just started throwing [stuff] together as a demo, with a drum machine, and we got a little more sophisticated with it than just the demo.

We added some Baata percussion, which is like this Afro-Cuban instrument that’s always played in threes, but it’s like three instruments that are always played together. It’s very odd. It’s nothing like Carribean or Cuban music that you normally will hear. It’s very odd percussion, no time signature... it’s very interesting. But anyway, that’s the stuff you hear through “Rockit” and in the background all these sounds that go, “bum bum ba, bum bum bum ba”... you know, that stuff, and it’s like three Bataas. We did that. That was recorded at my place. We did the scratching.

The funny thing about the scratching, by the way, was ... because Bill kept giving the DJ records to scratch, and the DJ couldn’t find anything — and Bill was giving him stuff like world music stuff; he would give him some Gamelon stuff or some stuff from India or Jujuca, or something — and the guy was like, “I don’t know. I’m not finding anything to scratch.”

And then, it was funny, because there was a pile of records that I’d recorded just kind of sitting there by the side, and I just picked one up off the top, because we really weren’t getting anywhere, and I said, “Why don’t you see if you can find something on this?” And I gave him this other hip-hop record and on the record, which is recorded at my place, he found a little vocoder break with the guy where there’s like... a vocoder is like a synthesized sounding voice, right? And the voice goes, “This stuff is really fresh.” And so he goes and he finds this and goes, “Oh, you know, maybe this will work — ‘fresh.’” So, then that worked.

So, I mean, what’s funny to me is that on “Rockit,” the record that’s scratched [was] also recorded at the studio.





Tuesday, January 06, 2009 7:28:58 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [0]
Martin Bisi: A conversation Part 1
Posted by peter

bisi_balloons_sm2.jpgThe list is a long one. Herbie Hancock, Afrika Bambaata, Brian Eno, Ginger Baker, John Zorn, Bill Laswell, Sonic Youth, Swans, the Dresden Dolls ... all have worked with the gifted producer/engineer Martin Bisi.

Known best, perhaps, for the work he did with Laswell’s Material project that resulted in the recombination of hip-hop and jazz DNA in Herbie Hancock’s Grammy-winning single “Rockit,” Bisi’s first real recording session was with Eno in the early ’80s. It was Eno who helped Bisi and Laswell construct a recording space in Brooklyn — BC Studio, which was originally dubbed OAO (Operation All Out, from William Burroughs’ novel “Naked Lunch”) that has served as a sort of sound lab for some of the major artists  making provocative avant-garde and indie-rock music over the last few decades.

It was Bisi’s explorations of early hip-hop that landed him a job as producer of early Sonic Youth records Evol and Bad Moon Rising, and after Bisi severed ties with Laswell and Material, he helped Cop Shoot Cop, Foetus, Live Skull and Unsane — to name a few — develop their own revolutionary aesthetic.

In 1988, Bisi got back with Material and the production team found itself in demand, with artists like Iggy Pop, The Ramones and White Zombie vying for their services. Forays into world music included work on a Ginger Baker solo album, Middle Passages.

Coming out from behind the boards in 2008. Bisi released his fourth solo album, Sirens of the Apocalypse (visit www.martinbisi.com to learn more about Bisi and the LP), an exploration of experimental-pop that draws inspiration from a variety of female characters. In part 1 of our interview with Bisi, we explore his new album, his work with Sonic Youth and his interest in graffiti art.

While Sirens of the Apocalypse is sort of all over the map musically, veering from shoegazer to punk-cabaret (“Goth Chick ‘98”) to psychedelia to straight-up indie rock, the overall production harkens back to the frenzied, burned-out beauty of the Sonic Youth recordings you worked on. Is there anything in particular you wanted to draw on from your experiences recording Sonic Youth for this record?
Martin Bisi: Well, I think we kind of have a common sensibility. So, it wasn’t really ... I mean, the sensibility was probably just there in my personality and maybe by complete coincidence, you know. I don’t think that they really sought me out because I’ve had a lot of ... I actually know for a fact that they didn’t seek me out because I had experience with the kind of stuff they wanted to do. I think at that point things were pretty unsophisticated.

They weren’t really thinking, “Oh, this person has a lot of studio experience with this kind of music.” There really wasn’t such a thing as someone with an indie-rock track record in recording — certainly not in multi-track recording. It hadn’t really gotten to that level. I think a lot of that music hadn’t really gotten to that... hadn’t even gone into a multi-track recording studio. So, they came after me really because I’d been doing a lot of hip-hop. And they were pretty fascinated by that whole thing, and then it turned out that I think a lot of our common experiences with... I mean, there’s definitely a lot of noise and a lot of abstract sonic stuff happening in New York and from different fields, you know.

There was like No-Wave. Even punk rock was sort of noisy and chaotic, you know, even straight-up punk rock. And then there was avant-garde... well, avant-garde was kind of an old story at that point, but it was sort of being reinvented, and even though Sonic Youth sort of were disassociating themselves with the avant-garde, they actually did not want to seem too arty, although that seems to be a little ironic at this point.

It does, yeah.
MB: But, they really wanted to draw the distinction. I mean, they were trying to be a bit more punk rock. And I think that’s why they were drawn to hip-hop in general. You know, that was sort of... that had a lot of street cred at the time, and I guess people didn’t want to be too highbrow. At least, I know they didn’t want to be too highbrow, and you can definitely see that in some of the lyrics. And people don’t really talk much about Sonic Youth’s lyrics, but a lot of their stuff is pretty much like... you know, kind of low brow, in some ways.

Yes, celebrity obsessed in some tracks.
MB: Oh, yeah, that too, for sure.

But definitely with a detached irony.
MB: Yeah, that’s in my stuff, too. Like in Sirens, it’s also... because all creativity is sort of reactionary, you know. I get flooded with a lot of highbrow, heady stuff. That’s the stuff that usually gets all the props, anyway. And then part of me is like, well, you know, there’s something to be said for low-brow, you know. I like Tone-Loc, or whatever — “Do The Wild Thing” or something.
There’s another side to creativity. And what’s funny is, ’cause someone had commented about like three months ago, they were just like kind of dismissing Sonic Youth a little bit, saying, “Well, some of those lyrics like, you know, it’s pretty much like let’s do it in the back seat.” There’s literally Sonic Youth lyrics that are like that. You know, and I thought, well, that’s funny. No one ever talks about that. And I was like, yeah, that is in there. And I was thinking, that’s funny. That’s like me also.

Gender issues are addressed heavily on this record. Where do you think relations between the sexes sit at this juncture in history, and why did you want to explore in such detail how women live?
MB: Well, um, it’s funny because in the past I always thought the idea of singing about girlfriends and loves and all these things I thought was sort of trite and maybe not very exciting in terms of songwriting. And I think maybe it was a time when I was young where I really didn’t care about, you know, songs about relationships or whatever, but I guess as it’s worn on, as my life has worn on, I’ve realized that that’s where really so much of the passion is. And as I’ve gotten older, and I grow more skeptical about other things, you know, whether it’s politics or the like, there’s no ... a lot less of my passion is invested in other things.

You grew up in New York City in the ’60s and early ’70s into a musical family that wanted to instill a full appreciation of formal, classical music. But you fought against that, and as a teen, you did a lot of graffiti art. Was that just the usual sort of teenager rebelling against what his parents thought was important, or was there something about the avant-garde that attracted you on a deeper level?
MB: I think a lot of it may be as simple as the usual teenage rebellion, you know. But I do think it might have been a good fit. You know, there might have been, in some other era, maybe it wouldn’t have been. Like I wonder, if I was that age now, whether I would have fit into anything, and whether I could have quote “succeeded” in a sense... because I’m still a bit of a late-’70s person, you know.

When you talk to me about my views on art or politics and stuff, it’s kind of late ’70s, so would I be ... that’s kind of one of those questions that’s impossible to answer. It’s sort of like, if we could go ahead like 40 years and have the same 47-year-old version of me, you know, 40 years from now, would I be the same person with the same viewpoints? I kind of think maybe I’d have the same viewpoints, but maybe things wouldn’t have panned out. Basically, there was a place for me, and there’s a lot about graffiti that kind of resonated.

Also, I think like you could just say it’s art. And you could say, that’s art, and there’s other art forms and other expressions now that sort of... you know, it’s still creativity. I think there are certain underlying sort of philosophies and attitudes that are kind of different. I mean, maybe these things go in cycles, but graffiti sort of resonated because it was very... one thing I did like about graffiti is that it had a very yin-yang kind of attitude. One thing I liked was, to really be considered graffiti, a graffiti artist, and not a "toy" — that was the term, you know, or dilettante or whatever — you had to have skills, and you had to get up, which means that it wasn’t enough to draw on your personal notebook.

You had to actually be out on the street. You had to be in people’s faces. You had to be in public view. And in a way, that’s still kind of how I feel. I’m a little shameless in feeling like that things need to be kicked out there. And I kind of feel like to me art is... it should be heard, it should be seen. You know, sometimes it seems like I’m shamelessly into self-promoting and making sure that things succeed or get out there, but it’s just sort of an ethic. It’s a bit of a yin and yang. Like with graffiti, if you weren’t putting it out on the street, if it wasn’t visible, publicly visible, it wasn’t even considered graffiti.





Monday, January 05, 2009 3:45:15 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [0]